Difference between revisions of "Cane Creek Double Barrel (TTX) Shock"
(→Springs) |
(→Springs) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==The Unit== | ||
| + | 2009 Cane Creek Double Barrel. #C6857. 10.5" ete, 3.5" Stroke. | ||
| + | |||
==Images== | ==Images== | ||
Comparision to Manitou <br> | Comparision to Manitou <br> | ||
| Line 16: | Line 19: | ||
http://www.canecreek.com/manuals/db_worksheet_2008_08_11.pdf | http://www.canecreek.com/manuals/db_worksheet_2008_08_11.pdf | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Dyno Chart== | ||
| + | This is just awesome. Not only does Cane Creek supply this to customers, but it also shows just how incredible this damper is.<br> | ||
| + | [[Image:CCDB-Dyno-Chart-Web.jpg]]<br> | ||
==Springs== | ==Springs== | ||
| Line 21: | Line 28: | ||
*350x3.5 | *350x3.5 | ||
*400x3.5 | *400x3.5 | ||
| − | *450x3.5 | + | *450x3.5 (currently used) |
I'm not very happy with the quality of these springs. They are not very true accross the usable range. The rates vary from 91% to 107% of labled rate. Not great by motorsport standards (within 2%) but better than what Fox clams as their tolerance (15%). Here is a dynamic rating of some motorsport springs: http://pvdwiki.com/index.php?title=Springs#All_springs_are_progressive | I'm not very happy with the quality of these springs. They are not very true accross the usable range. The rates vary from 91% to 107% of labled rate. Not great by motorsport standards (within 2%) but better than what Fox clams as their tolerance (15%). Here is a dynamic rating of some motorsport springs: http://pvdwiki.com/index.php?title=Springs#All_springs_are_progressive | ||
[[Image:CCDB-Spring-rate-graph.gif]] | [[Image:CCDB-Spring-rate-graph.gif]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Comparing Delrin End caps to Without=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Image:CCDB-Spring-rate-graph-delrin.gif]] | ||
===Spring Rating Setup=== | ===Spring Rating Setup=== | ||
[[Image:CCDB-Spring-rating.jpg]] | [[Image:CCDB-Spring-rating.jpg]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==End Bearings== | ||
| + | Bearings are marked as a Glacier Garlock product #K7A. 0.500" ID, 0.625" OD, 0.500" LG. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The bearings are a very light slip fit. Mine needed to be held in place using retaining compound, Loctite #680. "Slip fit" | ||
==PVD Spring Retainers & Reducers== | ==PVD Spring Retainers & Reducers== | ||
[[Image:CCDB-comp4.jpg]] | [[Image:CCDB-comp4.jpg]] | ||
| − | == | + | ==End Eye Options== |
[[category:Bicycle]] | [[category:Bicycle]] | ||
[[category:Suspension (Bicycle)]] | [[category:Suspension (Bicycle)]] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:13, 3 August 2010
Contents
The Unit
2009 Cane Creek Double Barrel. #C6857. 10.5" ete, 3.5" Stroke.
Images
Comparision to Manitou
Cane Creek Info
http://www.canecreek.com/component-shocks?product=double-barrel
http://www.canecreek.com/component-shocks?product=db-perfection
http://www.canecreek.com/component-shocks?product=db-sizes-weights
http://www.canecreek.com/tech-shocks?view=db-faqs
http://www.canecreek.com/manuals/Shock_Instructions/Double_Barrel/Double_Barrel_Instructions.pdf
http://www.canecreek.com/manuals/db_worksheet_2008_08_11.pdf
Dyno Chart
This is just awesome. Not only does Cane Creek supply this to customers, but it also shows just how incredible this damper is.
Springs
- 350x3.5
- 400x3.5
- 450x3.5 (currently used)
I'm not very happy with the quality of these springs. They are not very true accross the usable range. The rates vary from 91% to 107% of labled rate. Not great by motorsport standards (within 2%) but better than what Fox clams as their tolerance (15%). Here is a dynamic rating of some motorsport springs: http://pvdwiki.com/index.php?title=Springs#All_springs_are_progressive
Comparing Delrin End caps to Without
Spring Rating Setup
End Bearings
Bearings are marked as a Glacier Garlock product #K7A. 0.500" ID, 0.625" OD, 0.500" LG.
The bearings are a very light slip fit. Mine needed to be held in place using retaining compound, Loctite #680. "Slip fit"
PVD Spring Retainers & Reducers
